A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result spots are issue to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, which is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing paperwork, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to build a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are getting to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as the symbolic Irish Times article about René Collier character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.